View unanswered posts    View active topics

All times are UTC - 6 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Print view Previous topic   Next topic  
Author Message
Search for:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 10:16 pm 
Offline
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 10:55 am
Posts: 98
My new Sony 55" Grand Wega 3LCD has a native resolution of 1366x768 according to the manual. The manual does not detail any timing information.

I am using powerstrip to get a modeline configuration for my new Dragon (whee, thanks Human!)

I can't get a modeline to work at that resolution, but I did get a 720p modeline to work and I can get it down to about 5% vertical over scan.

I also can get a modeline with a resolution of 1200x666 to work with zero overscan.


My two questions:
What will be the result if I run 720p content across a resolution of 666?

Also, given this info would you rather have the overscanned 720 or the perfectly centered 666?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 11:45 am 
Offline
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 1:44 pm
Posts: 403
Location: Central NJ
I have a similar situation with a 1080i Sony SXRD. I've asked this in this post, http://mysettopbox.tv/phpBB2/viewtopic. ... highlight=
and I never really got an exact answer to it.


I run a 1920x1080 modeline to it. I then set up my myth menu resolution to to 18XX by 10XX (I forget the exact numbers). I have separate settings for the video, it which I just let it overscan naturally without correction. I guess I'm losing a little on the edges, but it might be better to do that than squashing it to make it fit. The only problem is that my desktop is obviously overscanned, but I don't go to the desktop that often.

_________________
Currently running: R5.5, HD5000 x 2, PVR150, Athlon 64 3000+, Chaintech VNF4, 1GB RAM, 2 x 250GB in LVM, MSI NX6200TC -> AA 9A60 -> HDTV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:44 pm 
Offline
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 8:30 am
Posts: 6
I run mine at 1232 by 690 just fine. HD looks the same as when I was running at normal 720p but without the overscan. Here is the relevant section of my XF86Config-4:

Code:
Section "Monitor"
        Identifier      "Monitor0"
        DisplaySize 480 270  #Added by Me
#       Option  "DPMS"  "true"
#       HorizSync    28.0 - 78.0 # Warning: This may fry very old Monitors
        HorizSync    45 # Warning: This may fry old Monitors
        VertRefresh  60 # Very conservative. May flicker.
        ModeLine "ATSC-720-60p" 74.25 1232 1320 1376 1648 690 710 716 750
EndSection


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:26 am 
Offline
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 290
If you guys are running LCD's shouldn't you get a bit-for-bit resolution? Maybe the newest Nvidia drivers still don't do this, but they're expected to soon. Problem is, the current drivers (last time I checked) don't support any res not divisible by 8 so you must run 1368x768 or 1360x768. It worked pretty well for my Sharp Aquos.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:14 am 
Offline
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 1:44 pm
Posts: 403
Location: Central NJ
Most people assume that fixed pixel displays such as LCD should display everything at 1:1 pixel mapping, but that usually isn't the case. They pretty much all still overscan.

If anyone has one that doesn't, please chime in and correct me.

_________________
Currently running: R5.5, HD5000 x 2, PVR150, Athlon 64 3000+, Chaintech VNF4, 1GB RAM, 2 x 250GB in LVM, MSI NX6200TC -> AA 9A60 -> HDTV


Top
 Profile  
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 


All times are UTC - 6 hours




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 87 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Theme Created By ceyhansuyu