LinHES Forums http://forum.linhes.org/ |
|
So long, and thanks for all the fish. http://forum.linhes.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=21063 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | grante [ Fri May 14, 2010 3:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | So long, and thanks for all the fish. |
I'm a little sad to say that after using MythTV for almost 7 years (using KM most of that time), I've switched to SageTV. Both the SageTV backend and frontend are running Linux, and I still maintain a KM box that I set up for some friends, so I haven't completely gone over to the dark side. The main reason I've switched is the continued lack of a decent (small, silent, low-power) MythTV frontend that can compete with boxes like the SageTV HD200 [http://www.sagetv.com/hd_theater.html]. I've spent the last two years waiting for some DLNA or uPnP STB to step up and fill the gap, but it never happened (and I've my doubts that it ever will). Over the years I've run three different combined FE/BE setups and one split FE/BE setup. The combined FE/BE setups were all too big, too hot, and too loud. It also seemed like a waste to keep a FE/BE machine on 24/7 when I had a different machine that was on 24/7. I know I probably could have set up the FE/BE machine to sleep when it wasn't busy, but that never sounded like a very easy task. The closest I came to a good frontend was a Mac mini with a wireless keyboard. The tab on that ran to nearly $500, and there were kinks I never did work out (DVI output, boot-time, slightly jerky HD decoding). AFAICT, putting together a good, HD-capable "Myth set-top-box" for under $200 is still impossible, so I finally gave up waiting and plunked down my $179 for an HD200 and $79 for a SageTV license. So far I'm pretty impressed. Everything pretty much "just worked" and playback of ATSC recordings is noticeably smoother than on either of my HD MythTV setups. And while the HD200 does a perfect job of decoding ATSC recordings, it never even gets warm to the touch. The SageTV UI has some quirks, but MythTV had more than its share of issues in that department. A few things that I like about SageTV when compared to MythTV: * Good frontend set-top-box. * No need for Qt or X11 on the backend machine. * Web interface that's easier to use (and easier to install/setup). * Scriptable in Python * Plugins written in Java instead of C++ * Plain text configuration files. * No subscription fees for schedule info Some drawbacks to SageTV when compared to MythTV * Memory intensive * Closed source * No built in commercial flagging (external Windows-only helper required) Oh, and the SageTV weather screens work. ![]() found to be true for MythTV for several years. Since I'm still maintaining somebody else's KM box, I'll be keeping an eye on the forum -- so if somebody does start to sell a good Myth frontend I'd still like to hear about it. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |