View unanswered posts    View active topics

All times are UTC - 6 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Print view Previous topic   Next topic  
Author Message
Search for:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:10 am 
Offline
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 8:31 pm
Posts: 1996
Location: /dev/null
My SATA drive seems awfully slow for the hardware specs of this Debian-Lenny system. Can you guys post the output of your hdparm -Tt commands with your hardware specs for me as well as provide any comments/suggestions?

Thanks!

Hardware specs: A7N8X-E Deluxe, Athlon XP 3200+, 2x512 meg DDR2-400, HDD is a Hitachi HDS722516VLSA80 150 GB SATA1 drive using the kernel's Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3112 driver.

Code:
# hdparm -Tt /dev/sda

/dev/sda:
 Timing cached reads:   1092 MB in  2.00 seconds = 546.06 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  176 MB in  3.02 seconds = 58.27 MB/sec


By contrast, here is the hdparm -Tt for my really old, 80 gig Western Digital WD800 UDMA-100 drive:

Code:
# hdparm -Tt /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 1142 MB in 2.00 seconds = 570.72 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 140 MB in 3.01 seconds = 46.48 MB/sec


Here is the output of sdparm:

Code:
# sdparm /dev/sda
    /dev/sda: ATA       HDS722516VLSA80   V34O
Read write error recovery mode page:
  AWRE        1
  ARRE        1
  PER         0
Caching (SBC) mode page:
  WCE         1
  RCD         0
Control mode page:
  SWP         0

_________________
Retired KM user (R4 - R6.04); friend to LH users.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:09 am 
Offline
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 5:28 am
Posts: 700
Location: Germany
I get similar results (same MB):

Code:
/dev/sda:
 Timing cached reads:   752 MB in  2.00 seconds = 375.35 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  224 MB in  3.01 seconds =  74.38 MB/sec
root@violet:~# hdparm -Tt /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 Timing cached reads:   742 MB in  2.00 seconds = 370.77 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  160 MB in  3.02 seconds =  52.94 MB/sec
root@violet:~#


There are a couple of reasons for this:

1. Most HDs are limited by their read/write speed. Not the cable speed.

2. The A7N8X-E Deluxe has an older SATA/150 which performs similarly to a PATA/133 in many cases.

Lot's more information here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sata#Throughput

_________________
ASUS AT3N7A-I (Atom 330)
TBS 8922 PCI (DVB-S2)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 8:46 am 
Offline
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 7:44 am
Posts: 287
Location: Los Angeles, CA
My system shows up with:
Code:
/dev/sdb
 Timing cached reads:   2060 MB in  2.00 seconds = 1030.04 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  212 MB in  3.01 seconds =  70.66 MB/sec

This is on a Seagate Baracuda 750GB drive. The sdparm output is the same.

_________________
Tim

LinHES 8.4
HDHR3
BioStar A770, AMD X2 4050e, 2GB RAM
GigaByte GeForce 8400, Chaintech AV710
USB-UIRT


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:11 pm 
Offline
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:07 pm
Posts: 821
Location: Melbourne, Australia
That's an interesting set of numbers. I hadn't used hdparm for years, but this is what it said about my WD 5000YS
Code:
/dev/sda:
 Timing cached reads:   5752 MB in  1.99 seconds = 2885.60 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  212 MB in  3.02 seconds =  70.24 MB/sec


Very cool: Didn't realise drives were that different in r/w speed.

Mike

_________________
*********************
LinHES 7.4
Australian Dragon
*********************


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:26 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 11:40 pm
Posts: 357
Location: Irvine, Ca
If you said what type fs you have on the partition, I missed it. I have just recently timed some xfs stuff here, and have discovered that on a new xfs partition it was really slow compared to a new ext3 fs on the same partiition. I'm sticking with ext3 from now on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:21 am 
Offline
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 5:28 am
Posts: 700
Location: Germany
The first number, "Timing cached reads" is a measure of the CPU, cache and memory. I.e. Everything except the HD. The second number is a measure of the HD speed. Surprising similar in all cases..... Except for graysky, but his drive appears to be an older generation (150G Sata1).

Dale,

Did you find a difference in the hdparm timings with different partition formats? That seems strange because hdparm doesn't take a partition as a parameter. I didn't think it measured the fs performance (what would it do with two partitions with different formats?).

_________________
ASUS AT3N7A-I (Atom 330)
TBS 8922 PCI (DVB-S2)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:23 am 
Offline
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 2:07 am
Posts: 1532
Location: California
Timings for Western Digital 750GB SATA green drive:
Code:
/dev/sda:
 Timing cached reads:   14070 MB in  1.99 seconds = 7053.55 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  230 MB in  3.00 seconds =  76.63 MB/sec
root@mythhd:~# hdparm -Tt /dev/hda


Timings for Seagate 400GB IDE drive:
Code:
/dev/hda:
 Timing cached reads:   13826 MB in  2.00 seconds = 6930.18 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  200 MB in  3.00 seconds =  66.62 MB/sec


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 5:54 am 
Offline
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:07 pm
Posts: 821
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Just so you know, the hdparm man page says that the numbers are meaningless if you don't perform the operation 2 or 3 times, the last one being most accurate.

Mine were all pretty close, though. WD5000YS
Code:
/dev/sda3:
 Timing cached reads:   5670 MB in  1.99 seconds = 2844.32 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  212 MB in  3.03 seconds =  70.07 MB/sec


I think the idea behind the 2-3 times is to wake the disk up. Numbers were substantialy different for another drive that doesn't get used much.

Mike.

_________________
*********************
LinHES 7.4
Australian Dragon
*********************


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 10:55 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 11:40 pm
Posts: 357
Location: Irvine, Ca
alien wrote:
Did you find a difference in the hdparm timings with different partition formats? That seems strange because hdparm doesn't take a partition as a parameter. I didn't think it measured the fs performance (what would it do with two partitions with different formats?).


Actually, I did not use hdparm on the partitions, I timed some actual work taking place on fresh new filesystems.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 1:37 pm 
Offline
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 8:31 pm
Posts: 1996
Location: /dev/null
An update, I think the numbers I was getting are just fine given the vintage of the hardware (SATA1). I ran the same on my P35-based/SATAII system and got the following under Ubuntu 8.10:

Code:
$ sudo hdparm -Tt /dev/sda1

/dev/sda1:
 Timing cached reads:   15880 MB in  2.00 seconds = 7952.77 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  344 MB in  3.01 seconds = 114.19 MB/sec

_________________
Retired KM user (R4 - R6.04); friend to LH users.


Top
 Profile  
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 


All times are UTC - 6 hours




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Theme Created By ceyhansuyu