View unanswered posts    View active topics

All times are UTC - 6 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Print view Previous topic   Next topic  
Author Message
Search for:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:03 am 
Offline
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 10:08 am
Posts: 1637
Location: Virginia, USA
How can I tell if I have the most recent version on my backend? Or is it somewhere locally that I can download it? I may need to clear out my channel info and have a funny feeling I have an early version of it that may not be complete.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 10:49 am 
Offline
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 7:05 pm
Posts: 5088
Location: Fontana, Ca
If you have R5A16, you have the latest. If you update to 0.18.2svn, you won't need the fixer!

_________________
cesman

When the source is open, the possibilities are endless!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 10:09 pm 
Offline
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 3:59 pm
Posts: 70
cesman wrote:
If you have R5A16, you have the latest. If you update to 0.18.2svn, you won't need the fixer!


Why not?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:39 am 
Offline
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:00 am
Posts: 9551
Location: Arlington, MA
Just a guess , but most likley because the same type of support is now done by the built in scanner. It'll be interesting to see how it deals with the botched IDs from some of the stations we've got in the Boston area...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 5:22 pm 
Offline
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:29 am
Posts: 2419
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
tjc wrote:
Just a guess , but most likley because the same type of support is now done by the built in scanner. It'll be interesting to see how it deals with the botched IDs from some of the stations we've got in the Boston area...

If 0.18.2svn's channel scan doesn't help you, let me know, and I'll see what I can do. For my local channels, I haven't needed DVB_fixer.sh in 0.18.2svn, so hopefully you won't need it either.

_________________
KnoppMyth R5.5
MythiC Dragon v2.0
Join the KnoppMyth Frappr!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 9:39 pm 
Offline
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:00 am
Posts: 9551
Location: Arlington, MA
I may have to post the OTA embedded name data next time, as an example of just how dumb some of these folks are. Bags of hammer and boxes of rock don't begin to cover it. ;-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 8:17 am 
Offline
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:29 am
Posts: 2419
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
tjc wrote:
I may have to post the OTA embedded name data next time, as an example of just how dumb some of these folks are. Bags of hammer and boxes of rock don't begin to cover it. ;-)

Heh. In my area, one channel gave me different results depending on when I scanned it in. One time it was "Adding WHTM-HD as 10#0" (wording not exact) and the next it was "Adding WHTM-HD as 271" (which was what it should have been). Signal strength did not appear to be a factor.

There are also problems with some stations transmitting garbage at the borders of the image. I guess they're still thinking in analog mode, where there'd always be some overscan. Our local PBS station is _perfect_ though, so it's probably just some cleanup the other channels will do as more people watch their HD feeds and complain.

_________________
KnoppMyth R5.5
MythiC Dragon v2.0
Join the KnoppMyth Frappr!


Top
 Profile  
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 


All times are UTC - 6 hours




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Theme Created By ceyhansuyu