View unanswered posts    View active topics

All times are UTC - 6 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Print view Previous topic   Next topic  
Author Message
Search for:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:32 pm 
Offline
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:01 am
Posts: 670
Location: Salem, MA
I recently added a 400GB drive to my backend and the physical size of my LVM partition is now about 1TB. Like in the past, I followed the instructions on the wiki to add the new drive to the virtual group. When I was running the resize2fs I noticed that it said it was resizing it to 4k blocks. What I am wondering is if I should be using a larger block size with a partition this large. Would this improve performance? Can I do this without destroying the data in the partition and how do I do that?

thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:02 am 
Offline
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 9:14 pm
Posts: 72
In theory, you should have a small performance using larger blocks when you doing large contiguous reads (like you would playing back a video). It also has the added advantage of decreasing the amount of fragmentation that occurs with deleting old videos and recording new ones (or recording two at the same time).

Ideally, you should have the OS, with smaller files, installed on a partition using the smallest block sizes, and the video files installed on a partition with the largest block sizes.


Top
 Profile  
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 


All times are UTC - 6 hours




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Theme Created By ceyhansuyu