View unanswered posts    View active topics

All times are UTC - 6 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Print view Previous topic   Next topic  
Author Message
Search for:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:57 pm 
Offline
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:07 pm
Posts: 339
I've started preparing to burn dvds of some shows, just to make room.

In preparation, I've gone in and corrected some cut points of these shows, and then I selected Transcode off the menu, as it says here:

http://www.knoppmythwiki.org/index.php? ... oEditHowTo

I noticed that after clipping commercials out of a half hour show, a 1.1 gig recording is shrunk to about 600 meg. I KNOW I didn't clip that much out of these shows.

Obviously it's running it into mpeg-4 compression, but am I losing quality? Is there a way to cut commercials without compressing it?

I did have some problems with getting transcoding to work. I was getting errors, and found I had the same problem as dwallace did, so I replicated his changes and transcoding works for me now. (here's the link to his thread.)
"R5C7 Transcoding not working - HOW I FIXED IT"
http://mysettopbox.tv/phpBB2/viewtopic. ... dec++94210

I'm wondering if I MPEG-4 is too low of a resoluton. I'd like to keep as near as possible video quality as I can on these things.

My last questions is if I even need to run transcode or not. If I run the Burn DVD function to create an iso, will it also run transcode? If I've already run transcode and clipped the commercials, obviously I don't need to check the Use Cutlist box.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:28 pm 
Offline
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:00 am
Posts: 9551
Location: Arlington, MA
[quote="borgednow"]Obviously it's running it into mpeg-4 compression, but am I losing quality? Is there a way to cut commercials without compressing it?[/quote]
Yes and yes. On the first search for "generational loss", basically every time to reencode something in a lossy format you lose more quality, and it's a cummulative process. On the second, search for MPEG2->MPEG2 lossless transcoding. Here is one thread - [url]http://mysettopbox.tv/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=8719&highlight=lossless+mpeg2+transcode[/url]

[quote="borgednow"]My last questions is if I even need to run transcode or not. If I run the Burn DVD function to create an iso, will it also run transcode?[/quote]
No you don't. As a matter of fact if you're making MPEG2 recordings that you're going to burn to DVD anyway I'd avoid it entirely.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:39 pm 
Offline
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:07 pm
Posts: 339
[quote="tjc"][quote="borgednow"]Obviously it's running it into mpeg-4 compression, but am I losing quality? Is there a way to cut commercials without compressing it?[/quote]
Yes and yes. On the first search for "generational loss", basically every time to reencode something in a lossy format you lose more quality, and it's a cummulative process. On the second, search for MPEG2->MPEG2 lossless transcoding. Here is one thread - [url]http://mysettopbox.tv/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=8719&highlight=lossless+mpeg2+transcode[/url]

Sweet, thanks.

[quote="borgednow"]My last questions is if I even need to run transcode or not. If I run the Burn DVD function to create an iso, will it also run transcode?[/quote]
No you don't. As a matter of fact if you're making MPEG2 recordings that you're going to burn to DVD anyway I'd avoid it entirely.[/quote]

Thanks. I thought I had to run transcode because the instructions seemed to state it was required, but after thinking about it, it must mean only if I'm keeping it on the mythtv system.

That will work for me. The shows I am burning to dvd that I want to keep highest quality will not be transcoded, but cutlisted. The ones I'm not as concerned about for quality I'll still transcode though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:51 pm 
Offline
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:00 am
Posts: 9551
Location: Arlington, MA
Use the lossless as a first choice. It'll usually knock stuff down by about 20-35% without a loss of quality. Since I record a couple minutes over before and after on most stuff, a HQ recording half hour show goes from 34 minutes and 1.6Gb to 22 minutes and 1Gb, which is at the high end of that range.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:05 pm 
Offline
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:07 pm
Posts: 339
[quote="tjc"]Use the lossless as a first choice. It'll usually knock stuff down by about 20-35% without a loss of quality. Since I record a couple minutes over before and after on most stuff, a HQ recording half hour show goes from 34 minutes and 1.6Gb to 22 minutes and 1Gb, which is at the high end of that range.[/quote]

Good idea. I've been noticing my recordings have sometimes been cutting off too soon. I haven't been extending my recordings because I only have 1 tuner as yet, but I don't record two consecutive shows that often.

It's much worse when the broadcast is delayed and I lose the last 15 minutes or so. At least it's not as bad as in England. I understand show scheduling there is just a half-hearted target.

But since most stuff I will keep I want to be as high a quality as I can get, the lossless is going to be my choice.


Top
 Profile  
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 


All times are UTC - 6 hours




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Theme Created By ceyhansuyu